Normally,
economic recoveries follow a pattern whereby the initial period of
recovery is rapid, and then the pace of growth slows down. The US
recovery did have the usual “V” shape, but it now seems that
rather than the pace of recovery slowing, it is actually
accelerating. The latest survey data from the Philadelphia Federal Reserve, known as the Philly Fed Index, showed a rise from 20.7 in October
to 40.8 in November. The last time the index was at that level was
in December 1993, but the jump in the index, to nearly double its
previous reading, and more than double the 18.3 that analysts had
been expecting, is unprecedented. In fact, its so huge that a number
of analysts believe it must be wrong. Perhaps so, but its not the
only data showing a strengthening US economy.
81% of US companies reporting profits have beaten expectations.
That is the fastest pace in four years. US profits in the current
earnings season are rising on average by around 12%. In addition,
the index of leading indicators, produced by the Conference Board,
rose sharply last month. The index gives a forward guide of future
growth in the economy. Having risen strongly, by 0.7%, in September,
the index rose even more strongly in October, by 0.9%, half as much
again as the Reuters consensus estimate of 0.6%.
If the
Philly Fed Index is correct, it implies growth in the Fourth Quarter
of 2014, in the US, of 6.5%. That would be a sizeable rise, even
compared with the 4.6% annualised growth rate, achieved in the second
quarter. It would be half as much again as the 3.5% growth rate of
the third quarter, and double current estimates of 3.2% for fourth
quarter growth.
The report
follows on several months during which employment growth has been
strong and rising, in the US, and when the unemployment rate has been
falling steadily, and is now close to the level considered by the
Federal Reserve to constitute full employment. Labour shortages in
some sectors have already been manifest, and that has gone along with
rising wages in certain parts of the economy, though not generally.
The Philly Fed's Employment Index more or less doubled in the last
month.
But, not all
the economic data shows such strong trends. According to Markit, US
factory activity slowed last month. Its Purchasing Managers Index
fell from 55.9 in the previous month to 54.7. The main reason seems
to have been weakness in US exports. That follows naturally both
from the fact that the EU economy has slowed considerably, and the
dollar has risen sharply in value in recent months, making US exports
less competitive. But, it should be born in mind that, as with all
other developed economies, manufacturing today only forms a small
part of total GDP. The majority of US GDP is accounted for by
service industry.
As I've
written previously, the US is likely to suffer the same three year
cyclical slow down as other global economies - The three Year Cycle Kicks In. That has already
affected China, Latin America and the EU. The latter is also
suffering from the self-imposed damage of austerity measures, as well
as from the effects of the economic sanctions imposed on Russia,
which barely affect the US economy, but impact heavily on European
growth.
The three
year cycle does not mean that economies necessarily go into
recession, only that they suffer around four quarters of slower
growth. Whether that means recession or not depends on the existing
strength of economic growth. The UK and EU have not had the strength
of economic growth that the US has enjoyed since 2009, because the US
continued, during that period, to apply measures of Keynesian fiscal
stimulus, whereas the UK, and parts of the EU, have damaged their
economies with Hayeckian policies of austerity. The latter
economies have, therefore, gone into the three year cycle in an
already weakened condition. As I wrote a while ago, the effect of
that in the UK is likely to be particularly sharp, because its
apparent health is a mirage. The underlying weakness of the economy
will, therefore, become more rapidly apparent.
The reason
the US economy is accelerating, rather than slowing down, is that
although it continued to apply measures of fiscal stimulus after
2009, it too has suffered from the same kind of political crisis that
has affected Europe. In the US, the Tea Party, which represents the
same kind of far right populism that is manifest in UKIP in Britain,
in the FN in France, in the Five Star Movement in Italy and so on,
has pushed opposition to fiscal intervention. In the same way that
these right-wing parties in Europe have acted as a whip on
traditional conservative parties, pushing them further into the adoption of
policies of fiscal austerity, and other measures in support of the
small capitalists they represent, so the Tea Party has forced the
Republicans to adopt a similar fiscally conservative stance.
Republicans
in Congress have been forced to oppose any further fiscal stimulus,
and Republican controlled state governments have adopted similar
positions undermining federal stimulus programmes. In Europe, a
political crisis that flows from the failure of social democracy to
push through the creation of a United State of Europe, which could
apply a single fiscal policy across the union, has encouraged the
growing conflict between nation states, and a resultant political
crisis. That political crisis is behind the economic weakness of
Europe. But, a similar political crisis exists in the US, and has
caused similar economic weakness, as repeated conflicts have broken
out over the Debt Ceiling, the Budget, and the Sequester, which have
threatened to bring the US government to a halt, and have undermined
the confidence of businesses and consumers to invest or spend.
The
testament to the success of the Keynesian fiscal stimulus adopted
after 2009, however, is that it seems to have put in place a
sufficient economic basis for the economy to begin to grow, once
those political crises have subsided. The effect of the Sequester,
which took out a large amount of planned state spending from the
start of 2013 has been accommodated within the overall growth of the
US economy. A large part of the explanation for the acceleration of
growth is that it is the delayed response to that stimulus, and the
ending of the political uncertainty that the previous political
crises inflicted. Its yet to be seen whether that may return as the
Republicans threaten to respond to Obama's executive action over
immigration, by using their financial power in Congress.
The
underlying basis of this growth is the fact that the global economy
continues to be going through the boom phase of a long wave cycle.
Indeed, its only because of that fact that Keynesian fiscal stimulus
has any possibility of working, by mobilising the huge reserves of
available surplus value to cut short cyclical crises. It is an
indication of the idiocy of conservative governments that in those
conditions, and with interest rates at levels not seen in centuries,
because of those reserves of surplus value, they not only fail to
adopt such policies, but inflict unnecessary damage on their
economies, and on the lives of millions of people by adopting
austerian economic policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment