Theories of Fixed and Circulating Capital. Ricardo

“On the one hand the circulating capital is here lumped together with the variable capital, i.e., with that part of productive capital which is laid out in labour. But on the other hand doubly erroneous definitions arise for the reason that the antithesis is not derived from the process of self-expansion of value — constant and variable capital — but from the process of circulation (Adam Smith’s old confusion).” (p 219)
But, Ricardo also distinguishes between these instruments of labour according to their durability, and places this distinction on the same level as the distinction between constant and variable capital. However, the former only determines how the value of constant capital is transferred to the end product, whilst the latter explains the source of surplus value.

That pre-empts Marx’s solution to the problem Ricardo sought to resolve i.e. the fact that prices differed from exchange values.
Looked at from the circulation process, there is instruments of labour (fixed capital) on one side, and labour and materials (circulating capital) on the other. Looked at from the production process and expansion of capital, there is constant capital (instruments of labour and materials) on one side, and variable capital (labour-power) on the other.
Back To Chapter 10
Forward To Part 2
Back To Chapter 10
Forward To Part 2
No comments:
Post a Comment