That capital assumed different forms, but its value remained, it simply threw off the shell of its previous existence, going from productive-capital to commodity-capital, to money-capital to once more becoming productive-capital again.
To the merchant from whom the productive-capitalist buys yarn, having themselves sold linen, the money they receive for the yarn appears as a return of money-capital, M – C – M', as they advanced money-capital to buy yarn, which they have now sold to the linen manufacturer.
“But to what extent are they that as distinct from the £2,000 representing the discarded money-form of the linen and the assumed money-form of the yarn? If the yarn dealer bought on credit and sold for cash before the expiration of his term of payment, then these £2,000 do not contain one penny of merchant's capital as distinct from the money-form which the industrial capital itself assumes in the course of its circuit.” (p 278)
In other words, the circuit really here is C' – M – C', not M - C - M', as it appears on the surface. The functioning merchant-capitalist begins not with money-capital, but with commodity-capital, which already contains surplus value. They metamorphose it into money-capital, which is really just the money form of this commodity-capital, the same capital-value in different form. They then metamorphose this money-capital once more into commodity-capital. For the merchant capitalist as much as for the productive-capitalist, it is only newly advanced money-capital, which has the circuit M – C – M'. The merchant capitalist as much as the productive-capitalist does not have as their purpose the increase in the amount of money-capital in their possession but, rather the increase in the amount of commodity-capital for the former, and productive-capital for the latter. M does not constitute a terminal point in the circuit of capital, for either of these types of capital, but is merely a moment within its overall circuit.
No comments:
Post a Comment