Marx deals
with this issue rather summarily. In Volume I, it was shown
that capital always finds the labour-power it requires. It can draw
on the reserve army of labour; it can increase the length or
intensity of the working day (even if it has to pay more in overtime
or other enhanced payments to do so); it can introduce machines to
raise labour productivity and so on.
What Marx
does not deal with here, but perhaps should have done, is not the
availability of this labour-power, but the availability of the
additional means of subsistence implied by the employment of this
labour-power. Workers paid wages for the first time, or paid more
wages, spend them buying means of subsistence, which means society has
to devote more social labour-time to that production. Marx deals
with this later in looking at accumulation in Department II.
The
consequence can be seen from the huge increase in the global
workforce, arising from the current Long Wave Boom – around 500
million additional workers, according to the ILO, in the first decade
of the 21st century – that has brought about a large
increase in demand, globally, for food and consumer goods.
In addition
to Labour-power always being available, it was shown, in Volume I,
that, within limits, production can be increased without additional
factories, machines and other instruments of labour. But, nearly all
such increases still require an increase in the circulating capital
advanced for materials to be processed.
In fact, it
can be seen that the limiting factor is not the availability of
money, but the availability of capital, and of social labour-time.
The latter is only a manifestation of the Law of Value as it affects
every mode of production, and of how it affects capitalism, in
particular.
If we take
the gold producer, for example, they have immediately, in their own
surplus product, the means by which to employ additional labour-power
and additional constant capital without the need to sell their
output. A proportion of their gold surplus can immediately be paid
as gold-money wages to additional workers, or for existing workers to
work longer hours. It can also immediately be used to buy the extra elements of constant capital required. But, the question is, will there be
sufficient additional means of subsistence for workers to buy with
those additional wages, will there be sufficient additional
commodities available as elements of constant capital? Marx does not ask or deal
with these questions here.
A look at
the experience of the current Long Wave Boom shows that, from its
inception, around 1999, the increased demand for raw materials has
caused global prices for them to rise sharply, as supply struggled to
match demand. Similarly, the 30% increase in the size of the global
working class, caused its demands for food and other consumer goods
to rise. As food production struggled to rise to match increased
demand, global food prices rose sharply. Other consumer goods prices
did not rise, because some of the same forces that generated the new
boom, i.e. significant rises in productivity, created by the
introduction of new technology, sharply increased the volume of such
use values brought to market, and likewise reduced their individual
values. In all of the production of goods and services in Man's
entire history, 25% occurred in the first decade of this century,
such has been the massive increase in productive potential.
The answer
to the questions above, and which Marx only gives later, in examining
accumulation in Department II, is that extended production means that
certainly more means of subsistence, as well as production, will become
available, on the basis so far outlined, and on the basis Marx turns
to next, in relation to Department II, but there is no guarantee that
they will increase sufficiently to meet all the needs for expansion.
It is quite likely then that a crisis of disproportion can develop,
and certain that short-term imbalances will only be dealt with by
fluctuations of market prices above and below the price of production.
No comments:
Post a Comment