Should Holding A Party In Your House Really Be A Crime?

Should holding a party in your house, really be a crime?  Should voluntarily going to a party in someone's house be a crime?

I think its only necessary to pose the question in this way to see that the answer is clearly no, it should not be a crime.  Not only should it not be a crime, but criminalising such normal behaviour should itself be seen as a crime, by removing from citizens, basic bourgeois rights and freedoms that have existed for more than 200 years.  Yet, its an indication of just how degenerate and deranged the politics in Britain - and not just Britain - has become that this criminal behaviour by the state, and its removal of basic rights and freedoms is accepted without question.  Indeed, its an indication of just how degenerate and deranged not only bourgeois liberals and social-democrats, but also many socialists, have become that far from protesting this removal of basic individual, human and workers' rights and liberties, they have instead encouraged the government into even greater removal of those rights and freedoms, even harsher enforcement of them!

At a time that the world is potentially on the brink of war over Ukraine, as NATO imperialism continues its push Eastwards, surrounding Russia and its allies, as it has been doing now relentlessly since the fall of the USSR, whilst the vile kleptocratic and totalitarian regime of Putin, and his clones in Belorussia and elsewhere, begin to push back against it, the media makes its headlines whether or not Boris Johnson held a party in Downing Street, more than a year ago.  Really?  That is the most important thing to be concerned with, now?  And, a totally bankrupt and opportunist Labour Party, unable to find even the faintest sliver of a political difference in terms of principles from the Tories, itself mires itself with the same endless chicken shit attempts at exposing Boris Johnson for engaging in the most mundane of activities that any rational person would never question - holding an informal birthday party!  Again, really?

Of course, Johnson has only himself to blame, because he introduced all of those ridiculous laws and regulations in the first place, to outlaw things that should never have been outlawed, that, for example, in Sweden never were outlawed, with no adverse affect, and so, created the rod for his own back, when he was found to be breaching them.  But, if the best that the Opposition can come up with is that Johnson breached laws that never should have been laws in the first place, it speaks volumes about just how dire politics in Britain has become in the wake of Brexit.