Labour
should say immediately and clearly - “There will be no deals with
anyone before or after the election.” Labour is under pressure
from the Tories to rule out a deal with the SNP, because they believe
such calls put Labour in a bind. If Labour does rule out such a
deal, the Tories believe, then it will do them damage in Scotland,
because the SNP will use it to accuse Labour of not caring about
Scotland. Moreover, the Tories believe that if Labour does rule out
such a deal, it will make it impossible for them to form a government
after the election, in the event of a hung Parliament. If Labour
rules out such a deal, with the SNP, the Tories would then move on to
demand they rule out a deal with the Greens, Sinn Fein and so on. On
the other hand, if Labour does not rule out a deal, it means that
every media interview will be taken up with wasted time of Labour
spokespeople being asked about the possibility of such deals, it will
mean the Tories will use the uncertainty to claim, as their poster
does, that Labour would be in the pocket of the SNP.
In fact,
none of these provide the Tories with the leverage they believe they
have. Firstly, to avoid further obfuscation, rather than just ruling
out a deal with the SNP, Labour should make clear that there will be
no deals with anyone. In that case, the SNP can hardly say that such
a position is because Labour does not care about Scotland. On the
contrary, the reason Labour should rule out a deal with the SNP, is
precisely because Labour DOES care about Scottish workers just as
much as English, Welsh or Irish workers. In fact, it would be good
if it could be claimed that Labour cares as much about French, German
and any other nationality of worker too. Labour should be able to
say that it is not an interest in abstract geographical areas that
matters, but the interests of workers wherever they live.
Moreover,
Labour can show that it has more concern for Scottish workers than do
the tartan Tories of the SNP, already. Given the collapse of oil
prices, and the need of Scotland to go cap in hand to the British
government, for a bail-out of the North Sea oil companies, Scottish
workers should be glad that Labour and other socialists opposed
Scottish independence, which would have left Scottish workers picking
up a huge tab, for the bailout of the North Sea oil capitalists, that
the SNP wants to provide, as part of their nationalist agenda.
Labour's message to Scottish workers should be clear, vote for us not
the tartan Tories of the SNP. Its not whether Labour agrees to a
deal with the SNP or not that does Labour damage, but the failure of
Labour to provide a clear alternative to the Tories, whichever
national flag they wrap themselves in. In fact, the best way of
labour avoiding being in a minority after the election, is to put
forward a clear set of policies to meet the needs of workers, in
contrast to the austerity policies of the Tories. That is the lesson
Labour should be learning from Syriza and from Podemos.
In fact, as I've set out previously, there is absolutely no reason for Labour to
offer any kind of deal to the SNP, because it is the latter that is actually in a cleft stick. The
SNP would have a choice, either vote to sustain a minority Labour
government, or be held responsible for putting the Tories back in
government. If they were seen to be responsible for the Tories
getting back into government by whatever means, the SNP would be dead
in Scotland, so why would Labour offer them anything for providing
the support they will have to give anyway?
If Labour
makes that absolutely clear now, there is, in fact, no reason for
anyone in Scotland to vote SNP, unless they are Tories.
That
undermines one plank of the Tories strategy. But, even were that not
the case, even were the SNP stupid enough to commit suicide by
refusing to vote for a minority Labour government. The Tories
strategy only has any sting, if its based on Labour being desperate
to get into office at any cost, just as were the Liberals and Tories
at the last election. Unfortunately, bourgeois parties and
politicians do tend to see the world in those terms, but even
bourgeois parties can sometimes see the logic in not taking office
for short term gain, if it means suffering longer term damage. That
is especially the case with the introduction of the Fixed Term
Parliaments Act.
There would
be every reason for Labour to refuse any such deals with minor
parties, in order to take up a position of extreme opposition to a
weak, minority Tory government that itself continually had to rely on
the votes of minor parties to get anything through. Such a
government would not last long. It would be held responsible for the
ensuing chaos and economic weakness, creating precisely the
conditions required for Labour to win a majority at the ensuing
election.
Labour
politicians, when asked, as they always are by the media, about deals
with the SNP, Greens etc. always reply by saying that they are aiming
for a majority, but the answer always appears, and is evasive,
because, as things currently stand, the most likely outcome will not
be a Labour majority, so the question still stands, of what you will
do if you are just the largest party. The best way of Labour
actually becoming the largest party after the election is to state
clearly now, that it will make no deals, before during or after the
election, with anyone. Labour will aim for a majority, but if it is
only the largest party it will seek to act as a minority government,
making no concessions in return for parliamentary votes. Whoever,
votes against it, or fails to support it, would then have to answer
to their supporters for opening up the possibility or eventuality of
a return of the Tories.
If Labour
really does want to be the majority party at the next election, it
should focus on putting forward clear alternative policies to the
conservative policies of the Tories, based on nationalism and
austerity. Labour needs to put forward a forward looking vision of
hope, based upon internationalism and an end to austerity, that links
up to other social-democratic forces like Syriza and Podemos, across
Europe.
No comments:
Post a Comment