As I predicted a few weeks ago, the BNP is now facing a legal challenge over its membership rules. The BBC reports, as I said that the law states that any organisation that receives Public Funds must comply with the law on Discrimination. See: BBC Injunction Threat To BNP .
But, of course,as these laws are written by a BRITISH Parliament, to protect the Rights of BRITISH citizens, guaranteed under a BRITISH Constitution, then a BRITISH National Party, should of course welcome them, shouldn't they? And after all, given the Expenses Row we wouldn't want BNP Councillors and other representatives having to pay back thousands of pounds in expenses they weren't entitled to, and facing the wrath of the Public over claiming them!
Now of course, the BNP might want to claim that people who live in Britain who are not white, are not really BRITISH, and so justify their discimination against them on that basis. But, in that case, what other fundamental rights would the BNP deny to these British Citizens? How would they determine who was white, and who wasn't?
The BNP's attempt to be clever and hide their true fascist nature under expensive suits is beginning to fall apart. It is wracked with contradictions, of which, this is just a small example. The divisiosn within its ranks between Griffin and those who want to present the best-suit approach, and its rank-and file base of assorted boot-boys has already manifested itself in splits and threats of splits. If as a result of Griffin's policy it faces the possibility of having to open its doors to non-whites - who iknows maybe all those thousands of Ghurkhas and their families some BNP members campaigned to be brought to Britain, in the hope of catching a populist bandwagon - then those divisions will explode, and the BNP with it. You can bet that the secret state already has its agents working away inside the BNP, to bring that about by whatever means it has available.
This is just the start of Big Capital and its state's moves to reign in the BNP. At the moment it may attract the backing of the odd maverick small capitalist, but Big Capital has no need of the BNP at the moment. It only needs to back fascist parties like the BNP when the working class is strong, and when its grip on power is weak. Neither, of those things are true at the moment, and so the BNP is a destabilising force for it. Although, the BNP crow over their recent election victories, the truth is that Griffin's vote in these elections actually FELL compared to the BNP vote in the previous Euro elections! If the BNP could not do well udner the condiitons of a severe economic recession, of a collapse of Labour, and the universal condemnation of all the mainstream parties due to the expenses scandals, it could never do well. For, Griffin's vote to actually fall udner those conditions does not at all bode well for the BNP in the next period. On the contrary, the internal divisiosn that must now open up due to the obvious contradictions, that wrack it, the turn in the economic climate, the fact that the expenses scandal will fade from memory in the next year, and the fact that the Capitalist State will begin to put the screws on the BNP mean it has seen its high-point, and it was not that high. Its now up to the Left, to get its act together and finish the BNP off.
As usual, an absurd mix of lies, rubbish and the bizarre.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, you didn't predict anything at all - the latest notion to try to "destroy" the BNP by stupid student politics rather then at the ballot box were touted around before and after the BNP success in those elections; funny enough though, they were not bothered about the BNP's membership criteria until the BNP started winning high office!!!
Amazing that!!!
But, in any case, the BNP membership criteria is perfectly legal as an exempted organisation under Section 25 and Section 26 of the Race Relations Act.
And the amazing hypocrisy is that this is coming from the Labour Party that has a Black Socialist Society within its own party!!!!! As well as allowing the Black Police Association and the hundreds of other racially exclusive organisations, many of which take public money - but I don't hear you shouting about that!!!
And this is from the same governemt who told us that the Iraq war was legal!!!
There is no split in the BNP - in fact quite the opposite, with its recent historical electoral victories morale appears to be very high.
But you have got one thing right: "the secret state" - that is the British government that you keep trumpeting as some kind of bastion of morality and standard - "has its agents working away inside the BNP, to bring that about by whatever means it has available" has happened in the past and no doubt some BNP members are secret state agents.
But I think that any normal democratic Briton would it that horrific and outrageous that a perfectly legal political party is being undermined by Banana Republic and totalitarian tactics, whereas an extremist like you thinks it is perfectly acceptable, and even funny.
And lastly, you keep using the Gurkha's as political tokens in you game but these are the very people that not only did you do absolutely nothing to help but you want to have disbanded, impoverished and prevented from earning the right to settle in the UK.
In fact you have enormous front even make any reference to the brave British military you were too cowardly to serve and as you demonstrated in you recent rant in another thread, you hate with a passion!!!